The European Commission is under fire from MEPs for a financial deal with Tunisia and a proposed aid package for Egypt, amid fears of compromising EU values and the requirement for transparency and adherence to human rights.
The European Commission is currently facing criticism from members of the European Parliament (MEPs) for a €150 million funding agreement with Tunisia, amid accusations that the funds, intended for migration and development, have been diverted to the hands of Tunisian President Kais Saied. MEPs are concerned that this sets a worrying precedent, especially with a substantial €7.4 billion aid package proposed for Egypt to support its economy and manage migration amidst regional instability caused by conflicts in Gaza and Sudan. The proposed deal with Egypt includes support for the energy sector, refugee management, and border security, specifically targeting the effects of the civil war in Sudan and fortifying the border with Libya.
MEPs have criticized the European Commission for jeopardizing EU values by potentially funding regimes that do not adhere to democratic principles and the rule of law. This controversy arises as the EU Parliament’s term ends before elections in June, prompting calls for clearer guidelines and stricter conditions on financial support to ensure transparency and adherence to human rights.
Simultaneously, Bosnia and Herzegovina is progressing towards EU membership, with the European Commission approving accession talks following significant reforms in fighting corruption within the country. This potential accession represents a strategic move towards EU integration for the Western Balkans and marks the first country poised to join the EU since Brexit. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Oliver Varhelyi have highlighted this as an investment in shared prosperity and security in Europe.
These developments reflect the EU’s nuanced approach to its external relations, balancing strategic interests in regional stability and migration management with the imperative of upholding democratic values and human rights.
