London mayoral race heats up with debates on road charges and women’s safety

As the mayoral election draws near, controversy surrounds road user charges while candidates present divergent plans to enhance women’s safety and face criticism over missed economic debates.
In recent developments concerning the London mayoral race, a point of contention has emerged over road user charges. Mayor Sadiq Khan’s ally, Hackney Labour councillor Mete Coban, suggested at a transport event that a pay-per-mile system might be considered in the future. This statement prompted Andrew Boff, a Conservative Assembly member, to seek clarity on Khan’s intentions, noting Khan’s previous mentions of road user charging in his 2023 book, “Breathe.” Khan’s administration insists that there are no current plans to implement such a system, attributing the concept to discussions under former Mayor Boris Johnson.
Regarding women’s safety, Mayor Khan, who is vying for a third term, has proposed a 10-point plan to tackle violence against women and girls. This includes providing free legal advice to survivors of rape and serious sexual offenses and addressing misogyny in schools. His opponent, Conservative candidate Susan Hall, critiques Khan’s strategies and suggests alternatives including recruiting more police officers and appointing a women’s commissioner.
The tone of the mayoral campaign has also seen an infusion of aggressive political advertising, likened to tactics common in US politics. This shift is facilitated by the lack of strict regulations on online platforms compared to traditional broadcasting, increasing the presence of such ads in UK campaigns.
Additionally, the business community expressed disappointment after both Khan and Hall withdrew from a scheduled hustings event meant to discuss economic strategies for London. The absence of the candidates from this traditional forum has led to frustration among business leaders, underscoring the importance of mayoral influence on London’s economic environment.
With the mayoral election approaching, these issues highlight the diverging approaches and priorities of the candidates, set against a backdrop of evolving campaign tactics and ongoing dialogue with the city’s economic and social sectors.